Is Sling TV in Trouble?

Discussions about the latest IPTV industry news.
Post Reply
rusty
TVRO Guru
TVRO Guru
Articles: 0
Posts: 515
Joined: Sat Jul 26, 2014 6:52 pm
Has thanked: 21 times
Been thanked: 8 times

Is Sling TV in Trouble?

Post by rusty » Mon Mar 26, 2018 11:41 pm

AT&T is the largest telecom company in the world. Now they are buying up programmers like Time Warner. Time Warner owns HBO, Cinemax, Turner Television and more. It is only a matter of time before these guys buy up the rest of the programmers. Dish/Sling are crying they will be treated like Rainier :lol: and told :noway when it comes to acquiring programming in the future. Another case of 'Rainiertitus'? :thinking


Sling TV Chief: “There Would Be Severe Bleeding” From AT&T-Time Warner Deal
by Dade HayesMarch 26, 2018 3:23pm

Warren Schlichting, group president of Sling TV, offered a dire warning about the pending AT&T-Time Warner merger during his testimony this afternoon as a witness in the government’s lawsuit seeking to block the deal.

“We would lose a lot of subs,” Schlichting said during an hour and a half of testimony in U.S. District Court in Washington, D.C. “There would be severe bleeding. It would be lose/lose for us, win/win for them.”

The Department of Justice called Schlichting as its second witness of a possible 30 as the projected eight-week trial’s second day unfolded in herky-jerky fashion. (Morning testimony was sidelined completely by the revelation that an independent lawyer representing Sling parent Dish Network had supplied Schlichting with a transcript of Thursday’s opening arguments and opening witness testimony.)

Central to the government’s case against the $85 billion deal is the idea that AT&T, once it controls both DirecTV, its skinny-bundle sibling DirecTV Now and the potent content lineup of Turner Broadcasting, Warner Bros. and HBO, could use the assets as a cudgel. Rivals and consumers would lose out, he said. The sandy-haired, even-keeled Schlichting returned to that notion repeatedly during his time on the stand, contending that AT&T would be more motivated by the potential to lure Dish subscribers than by reaching fair carriage deals.

“The gross profit of Dish subscriptions is higher than the programming fees it could collect,” he said. That would create a “Hobbes-ian choice” for Dish and Sling when sitting across the bargaining table from Turner. “I don’t see them having any motivation to move,” he added.

One immediate threat would be that Sling, which markets its internet-delivered service as a contract-free, bargain-priced alternative to the bloated conventional cable bundle, would be forced to carry more networks. Sling’s basic “orange” service includes about 20 networks from various companies for a $20 monthly rate. From the Turner fold, TNT, TBS, CNN and Cartoon Network are included in that package.

With AT&T calling the shots, less-viewed channels like TruTV or HLN could be forced on Sling, with rivals like Fox or Discovery following suit. “It only takes a couple of those, and the model’s broken,” he said.

The legal team representing AT&T and Time Warner is scheduled to get its chance to cross-examine Schlichting on Tuesday morning, On Thursday, when the government put forward another pay-TV exec, cable operator Cox Communications VP of content acquisition Suzanne Fenwick, lead defense attorney Daniel Petrocelli succeeded in undermining her testimony during his cross. “Don’t you think, with a merger this important, that you should have done some homework?!” he exclaimed at one point.

One fertile area for Petrocelli’s side could be Schlichting’s characterization of the profit margins. During another point in his testimony, he described Sling’s margins as “razor–thin” and AT&T has largely lost money on the launch of DirecTV Now, but has built it out as a bet on future TV consumption. Petrocelli emphasized during his opening argument that securing wide carriage for Turner networks remains a top priority for Time Warner and AT&T and forgetting that to try to punish rivals would be “economically ruinous.”

Guided by prosecutors, Schlichting sought to underscore his fear of carriage drama by pointing to an impasse between Dish and Turner in late 2014, on the eve of Sling’s launch in February 2015. In a creative turn of phrase, he likened carriage deals to “ancient Greece, with one civilization built on top of the next.” In a less felicitous metaphor, he compared carriage impasses as “like having a heart attack” for a distributor. “You can get yourself back into shape but you’re never the same again.”

As an early entrant into the skinny-bundle chase, Sling has amassed 2.2 million subscribers to lead the pack (DirecTV Now, which launched in November 2016, has about half that number.) All of that hard-won market success, Schlichting maintained, could be for naught if the DOJ does not prevail.

The merger “throws the card table up in the air,” he said. “We need each other now. I describe it as a ‘mutual headlock.’ We both know we need to get to a deal.” After a merger, he added, “all of the incentives change.”

The trial is expected to resume in closed session Tuesday morning, with Schlichting continuing on the witness stand and attorneys sorting out several pending issues. Once Schlichting then faces cross-examination, he is expected to be followed on the witness stand by John Martin, CEO of Turner Broadcasting. Martin, who last month blasted the DOJ as “clueless” and its case as nonsensical, is one of 30 witnesses being called by the government, which presents its case before resting and giving the defense its turn.

With today’s stop-and-start rhythm, plus the Monday-through-Thursday hours Leon has imposed, trial watchers are already wondering if the case will be resolved before the deadline of June 21 that AT&T and Time Warner have set to complete the get-together. That “drop-dead” date has already been pushed once, so it could always move again, though the companies — and the industry awaiting clarity on the M&A front — can ill afford many more delays.
http://deadline.com/2018/03/sling-tv-se ... 202353711/
12' Cosmos Primestar (refurbished)36" SuperJack Actuator
Chaparral Corotor Feed (Norsat 8115, 4106A)
ZGemmaH7 UHD, OctagonSX88 HD, Edision UHD, DSR-6000, DSR-6050
Clarke Belt: 22W - 133W

User avatar
tvroadmin
TVRO Administrator
TVRO Administrator
Articles: 1
Posts: 902
Joined: Sat Mar 01, 2014 1:00 am
Has thanked: 13 times
Been thanked: 56 times

Re: Is Sling TV in Trouble?

Post by tvroadmin » Tue Mar 27, 2018 5:26 am

AT&T controls the fiber backbone in America and now they are buying the content providers which they plan to sell exclusively over their proprietary network. Unless someone else develops their own competing network (e.g. a nationwide microwave network) and buys up content on the cheap, AT&T will be the only game in town (at least in the USA). As if prices were not high enough already...
Administrator
([email protected])

Arion
TVRO Guru
TVRO Guru
Articles: 0
Posts: 217
Joined: Wed Oct 11, 2017 6:05 pm
Has thanked: 3 times
Been thanked: 29 times

Re: Is Sling TV in Trouble?

Post by Arion » Tue Mar 27, 2018 2:17 pm

Except for the fact that a goodly number of American's have no access to fiber or real high speed Internet in order to stream. I have Satellite Internet as I live in the boonies. The current generation is a whole lot better than when they first come out but network congestion leaves you unable to stream even at sub standard definition such as youtube during peak times.
10' Tek C-band dish, 1.2 meter KU band dish, ASC1 mover, Octagon/Zgemma/Edison dual band STB's. Running OpenPli on all.

dishcrank
TVRO Guru
TVRO Guru
Articles: 0
Posts: 391
Joined: Thu Jul 14, 2016 1:14 am
Has thanked: 13 times
Been thanked: 24 times

Re: Is Sling TV in Trouble?

Post by dishcrank » Tue Mar 27, 2018 10:23 pm

Arion wrote:
Tue Mar 27, 2018 2:17 pm
Except for the fact that a goodly number of American's have no access to fiber or real high speed Internet in order to stream. I have Satellite Internet as I live in the boonies. The current generation is a whole lot better than when they first come out but network congestion leaves you unable to stream even at sub standard definition such as youtube during peak times.
Arion wrote:
Tue Mar 27, 2018 2:17 pm
Except for the fact that a goodly number of American's have no access to fiber or real high speed Internet in order to stream. I have Satellite Internet as I live in the boonies. The current generation is a whole lot better than when they first come out but network congestion leaves you unable to stream even at sub standard definition such as youtube during peak times.
I hear you!!

You might want to check out a new service from viasat which just launched on 69W. They use the ka band and offer speeds up to 100 mbps.

https://www.cnbc.com/2018/02/27/viasat- ... nline.html

Homepage is viasat.com

Anyone know how much they charge?

Post Reply

Return to “IPTV News”